To pull or not to pull

Ask a Question related to Photography, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default To pull or not to pull

    I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this pulled one stop,
    or is there little difference in the outcome?


    Mark


    Mark Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. dynamic pull-down based on another pull-down
      Greetings, is there a tech doc somewhere to show: 1) 2 pull-downs, dynamically loaded from two record sets. first is "State" and next is "City"...
    2. Pull down menu
      HI... i have design simple web site with dreamwear using asp and vbscript i have design simple employee rocord table i have put dynamic pull...
    3. PHP Pull-down menu
      I am new to PHP. I developed a membership program which allows user to add, edit and print membership list. I would like to modify the menu...
    4. Can't pull up old threads
      I'm using Google groups to view this board, and for some reason, I can't pull up a thread I started on 27 September. I also used Outlook Express...
    5. Pull down and add
      I know how to enter data to a SQL database from a form. I am making a form where the user inputs some numbers. Than other users login to this...
  3. #2

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:20:52 -0600, Mark wrote:
    > I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this pulled one stop,
    > or is there little difference in the outcome?
    without the capabilities of time travel, there is little difference, at
    this point


    --
    Comrade
    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]
    the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
    [url]http://www.aclu.org/dissentreport[/url]
    Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesus
    we must close the door by which aristocracy arises

    "Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
    Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
    than the man who has the good forced upon him?"
    a quote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kubrick

    Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incurred tutelage.
    Tutelage is man's inability to make use of his understanding
    without direction from another. Self-incurred is this tutelage when
    its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution
    and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere aude!
    "Have courage to use your own reason!" - that is the motto
    of enlightenment.
    Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

    "It all sums up into one single purpose,
    the abolition of dog-eat-dog under which we live...
    and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
    -- Roger Baldwin, Co-Founder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

    "Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in
    Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in"
    MOODY BLUES

    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]

    Comrade Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull


    "Mark" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message
    news:vi0Ta.3659$Fy1.169009@localhost...
    > I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this
    pulled one stop,
    > or is there little difference in the outcome?
    >
    >
    > Mark
    >
    >
    B&W or color negative it will make little difference.
    Because of the way ISO speeds are measured for B&W film the
    exposure is a minimum. Many find exposing an additional stop
    yields better shadow detail.
    Development time really affects contrast. While it also
    affects effective speed it does so indirectly by varying the
    low densities a small amount. No amount of pushing, for
    instance, will compensate for severe underexposure, there
    just isn't any image recorded. Recucing devlopment for
    severe overexposure can make the negagives much easier to
    print but higher contrast paper must be used to get the
    contrast back up.
    Exposure errors for reversal color are more serious
    because there is not much range of compensation for the
    reversal image. However, adjusting first development of
    reversal materials can sometimes give a useable result where
    there is an exposure error large enough to be unusable
    otherwise.
    Again, if this is B&W negative material develop it
    normally, the results will be fine.


    Richard Knoppow Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull


    pulling film can cause far more problems than you are hoping to prevent,

    > I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this pulled one stop,
    > or is there little difference in the outcome?
    >
    >
    > Mark
    >
    >

    zeitgeist Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    In article <pan.2003.07.22.01.27.29.700973@mysolution.ws>, "Comrade" <averagejoe@mysolution.ws> wrote:
    > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:20:52 -0600, Mark wrote:
    >
    > > I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this pulled one stop,
    > > or is there little difference in the outcome?
    >
    > without the capabilities of time travel, there is little difference, at
    > this point
    You really are a goofball.

    --
    There was a man so wise he jumped into a sandy place
    and burnt out both his eyes. And when he knew his eyes were
    gone he offered no compliant. He summoned up a vision and made himself a saint.
    Paul Attreides Guest

  7. #6

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    If its color negative run it normal
    If its Color slide and you bracketed your exposures
    a 1/2 stop pull will saturate the colors somewhat at
    the top of the bracket. If you did not bracket run it normal.

    BW film you could pull half a stop but should only if the
    highlights are close to the maximum you could print like Zone
    8-9


    In article <vi0Ta.3659$Fy1.169009@localhost>, "Mark" <dont@spam.me> wrote:
    > I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this pulled one stop,
    > or is there little difference in the outcome?
    >
    >
    > Mark
    --
    There was a man so wise he jumped into a sandy place
    and burnt out both his eyes. And when he knew his eyes were
    gone he offered no compliant. He summoned up a vision and made himself a saint.
    Paul Attreides Guest

  8. #7

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 04:14:53 +0000, Paul Attreides wrote:
    > In article <pan.2003.07.22.01.27.29.700973@mysolution.ws>, "Comrade" <averagejoe@mysolution.ws> wrote:
    >
    >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:20:52 -0600, Mark wrote:
    >>
    >> > I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this pulled one stop,
    >> > or is there little difference in the outcome?
    >>
    >> without the capabilities of time travel, there is little difference, at
    >> this point
    >
    > You really are a goofball.

    if he didn't consider exposing for pull, it is not a pull situtation,
    unless he screwed up the exposure, which he didn't say, so I assumed he
    has normal exposures and wants some sort of condolescences that he didn't
    expose them differently


    --
    Comrade
    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]
    the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
    [url]http://www.aclu.org/dissentreport[/url]
    Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesus
    we must close the door by which aristocracy arises

    "Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
    Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
    than the man who has the good forced upon him?"
    a quote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kubrick

    Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incurred tutelage.
    Tutelage is man's inability to make use of his understanding
    without direction from another. Self-incurred is this tutelage when
    its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution
    and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere aude!
    "Have courage to use your own reason!" - that is the motto
    of enlightenment.
    Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

    "It all sums up into one single purpose,
    the abolition of dog-eat-dog under which we live...
    and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
    -- Roger Baldwin, Co-Founder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

    "Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in
    Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in"
    MOODY BLUES

    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]

    Comrade Guest

  9. #8

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    On 7/21/2003 9:31 PM Comrade spake thus:
    > On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 04:14:53 +0000, Paul Attreides wrote:
    >
    >> In article <pan.2003.07.22.01.27.29.700973@mysolution.ws>, "Comrade" <averagejoe@mysolution.ws> wrote:
    >>
    >>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:20:52 -0600, Mark wrote:
    >>>
    >>> > I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this pulled one stop,
    >>> > or is there little difference in the outcome?
    >>>
    >>> without the capabilities of time travel, there is little difference, at
    >>> this point
    >>
    >> You really are a goofball.
    >
    > if he didn't consider exposing for pull, it is not a pull situtation,
    > unless he screwed up the exposure, which he didn't say, so I assumed he
    > has normal exposures and wants some sort of condolescences that he didn't
    > expose them differently
    Methinks you're needlessly confusing a simple situation.

    As I read the OP's question, he accidently [over]exposed ASA 200 film at 100
    (the assumption being that he *correctly* exposed it as if it were ASA 100).
    Therefore, it's a perfect candidate for pull processing.

    What part of this are you having problems with?

    --
    We are receiving alerts about a worm that is spreading around the Internet
    contained in a .zip archive file. What is surprising to security analysts
    is that this worm is spreading at all since it cannot execute without user
    intervention. Security analysts believe the rapid spread indicates that
    recipients are still opening email attachments even after they have been
    warned many times that it is unsafe to do so.

    - Description of the "Sobig.E" worm, ca. June 2003

    David Nebenzahl Guest

  10. #9

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    First and foremost your a goof ball as stated previously,
    secondly you all are a bunch of cross posting idiots,...

    I am only here to set the record straight.

    Third since when does pull processing soley hindge on how
    the film was exposed Third learn to spell. Its "elucidate".
    Lastly if anyone knows how to pull their PUD its proably
    you, you seem to be an expert on that.

    Good day.

    In article <pan.2003.07.23.00.20.38.869051@mysolution.ws>, "Comrade" <averagejoe@mysolution.ws> wrote:
    > On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:23:40 -0700, David Nebenzahl wrote:
    > > As I read the OP's question, he accidently [over]exposed
    > WRONG, he did not eludidate the exposure at all
    > he said he had exposures and asked whether to pull them, and I said he
    > should pull his pud instead because he should have thought about pull
    > beforehand, and thinking of pull afterwards, is only applicable to
    > incorrect exposure, which he did not elucidate
    > touche, arrogant ruffian dog
    > Comrade
    --
    There was a man so wise he jumped into a sandy place
    and burnt out both his eyes. And when he knew his eyes were
    gone he offered no compliant. He summoned up a vision and made himself a saint.
    Paul Attreides Guest

  11. #10

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    If it is print film don't even bother at all! If it is slide yes.


    "David Nebenzahl" <nobody@but.us.chickens> wrote in message
    news:3F1DC77C.7080000@but.us.chickens...
    > On 7/21/2003 9:31 PM Comrade spake thus:
    >
    > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 04:14:53 +0000, Paul Attreides wrote:
    > >
    > >> In article <pan.2003.07.22.01.27.29.700973@mysolution.ws>, "Comrade"
    <averagejoe@mysolution.ws> wrote:
    > >>
    > >>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:20:52 -0600, Mark wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>> > I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this pulled one
    stop,
    > >>> > or is there little difference in the outcome?
    > >>>
    > >>> without the capabilities of time travel, there is little difference,
    at
    > >>> this point
    > >>
    > >> You really are a goofball.
    > >
    > > if he didn't consider exposing for pull, it is not a pull situtation,
    > > unless he screwed up the exposure, which he didn't say, so I assumed he
    > > has normal exposures and wants some sort of condolescences that he
    didn't
    > > expose them differently
    >
    > Methinks you're needlessly confusing a simple situation.
    >
    > As I read the OP's question, he accidently [over]exposed ASA 200 film at
    100
    > (the assumption being that he *correctly* exposed it as if it were ASA
    100).
    > Therefore, it's a perfect candidate for pull processing.
    >
    > What part of this are you having problems with?
    >
    > --
    > We are receiving alerts about a worm that is spreading around the Internet
    > contained in a .zip archive file. What is surprising to security analysts
    > is that this worm is spreading at all since it cannot execute without user
    > intervention. Security analysts believe the rapid spread indicates that
    > recipients are still opening email attachments even after they have been
    > warned many times that it is unsafe to do so.
    >
    > - Description of the "Sobig.E" worm, ca. June 2003
    >

    Serge Kozak Guest

  12. #11

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:53:21 +0000, Paul Attreides wrote:
    > Third since when does pull processing soley hindge on how
    > the film was exposed
    the man did not say he was seeking an abtract art effect, which is the
    ONLY time processing is not directly tied to exposure, touche, ruffian dog


    --
    Comrade
    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]
    the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
    [url]http://www.aclu.org/dissentreport[/url]
    Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesus
    we must close the door by which aristocracy arises

    Statements of supposed science, without statistics, are just as much religion,
    and ONLY statements of faith as any religion, or statement of faith,
    except they profess the supposed scientist is God, even more
    dangerous than religion or God. There is no science, without a statement of
    statistics, AND any statement without statistics, is a conjecture of faith
    by the professor of such statement, and the "believer". An ethical
    house cleaning of science and government is in order.

    "Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
    Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
    than the man who has the good forced upon him?"
    a quote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kubrick

    Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incurred tutelage.
    Tutelage is man's inability to make use of his understanding
    without direction from another. Self-incurred is this tutelage when
    its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution
    and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere aude!
    "Have courage to use your own reason!" - that is the motto
    of enlightenment.
    Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

    "It all sums up into one single purpose,
    the abolition of dog-eat-dog under which we live...
    and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
    -- Roger Baldwin, Co-Founder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

    "Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in
    Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in"
    MOODY BLUES

    "Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:6
    (religious and political leaders that are hypocrites)

    (leaven is yeast, AIR IN BREAD, bullshit, fluff, marketing, snake oil - HYPOCRISY)

    "How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:11-12

    "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."--Matthew 23:14

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."--Matthew 23:15

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone."--Matthew 23:23

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess."--Matthew 23:25

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."--Matthew 23:27

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,"--Matthew 23:29

    "And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod."--Mark 8:15

    "And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the marketplaces,"--Mark 12:38


    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]

    Comrade Guest

  13. #12

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull


    "Paul Attreides" <blu-iyzr@arrakis.com> wrote in message
    news:blu-iyzr-2207032057420001@pool-151-196-172-51.balt.east.verizon.net...
    > First and foremost your a goof ball as stated previously,
    > secondly you all are a bunch of cross posting idiots,...
    >
    > I am only here to set the record straight.
    >
    > Third since when does pull processing soley hindge on how
    > the film was exposed Third learn to spell. Its "elucidate".
    > Lastly if anyone knows how to pull their PUD its proably
    > you, you seem to be an expert on that.
    >
    > Good day.
    >
    Wouldn't it be a good idea to make sure that one does not make grammatical
    or spelling mistakes in a post complaining about the mistakes in kind of
    others?

    -Peter De Smidt


    Peter De Smidt Guest

  14. #13

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 20:48:03 -0500, Peter De Smidt wrote:
    > Wouldn't it be a good idea to make sure that one does not make grammatical
    > or spelling mistakes in a post complaining about the mistakes in kind of
    > others?

    establish where I criticized grammer, semantics, or spelling

    ruffian dog

    --
    Comrade
    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]
    the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
    [url]http://www.aclu.org/dissentreport[/url]
    Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesus
    we must close the door by which aristocracy arises

    Statements of supposed science, without statistics, are just as much religion,
    and ONLY statements of faith as any religion, or statement of faith,
    except they profess the supposed scientist is God, even more
    dangerous than religion or God. There is no science, without a statement of
    statistics, AND any statement without statistics, is a conjecture of faith
    by the professor of such statement, and the "believer". An ethical
    house cleaning of science and government is in order.

    "Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
    Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
    than the man who has the good forced upon him?"
    a quote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kubrick

    Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incurred tutelage.
    Tutelage is man's inability to make use of his understanding
    without direction from another. Self-incurred is this tutelage when
    its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution
    and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere aude!
    "Have courage to use your own reason!" - that is the motto
    of enlightenment.
    Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

    "It all sums up into one single purpose,
    the abolition of dog-eat-dog under which we live...
    and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
    -- Roger Baldwin, Co-Founder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

    "Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in
    Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in"
    MOODY BLUES

    "Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:6
    (religious and political leaders that are hypocrites)

    (leaven is yeast, AIR IN BREAD, bullshit, fluff, marketing, snake oil - HYPOCRISY)

    "How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:11-12

    "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."--Matthew 23:14

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."--Matthew 23:15

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone."--Matthew 23:23

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess."--Matthew 23:25

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."--Matthew 23:27

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,"--Matthew 23:29

    "And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod."--Mark 8:15

    "And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the marketplaces,"--Mark 12:38


    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]

    Comrade Guest

  15. #14

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull


    "Comrade" <averagejoe@mysolution.ws> wrote in message
    news:pan.2003.07.23.02.04.30.985549@mysolution.ws. ..
    > On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 20:48:03 -0500, Peter De Smidt wrote:
    >
    > > Wouldn't it be a good idea to make sure that one does not make
    grammatical
    > > or spelling mistakes in a post complaining about the mistakes in kind of
    > > others?
    >
    >
    > establish where I criticized grammer, semantics, or spelling
    >
    > ruffian dog
    >
    The complete post that you're referring to went as follows:

    <original post>
    "Paul Attreides" <blu-iyzr@arrakis.com> wrote in message
    news:blu-iyzr-2207032057420001@pool-151-196-172-51.balt.east.verizon.net...
    > First and foremost your a goof ball as stated previously,
    > secondly you all are a bunch of cross posting idiots,...
    >
    > I am only here to set the record straight.
    >
    > Third since when does pull processing soley hindge on how
    > the film was exposed Third learn to spell. Its "elucidate".
    > Lastly if anyone knows how to pull their PUD its proably
    > you, you seem to be an expert on that.
    >
    > Good day.
    >
    Wouldn't it be a good idea to make sure that one does not make grammatical
    or spelling mistakes in a post complaining about the mistakes in kind of
    others?

    -Peter De Smidt

    <end original post>

    Thus, unless you (ruffian dog) are Paul Attreides, I was not addressing my
    comments to you. How was this unclear?

    -Peter De Smidt


    Peter De Smidt Guest

  16. #15

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:08:51 -0500, Peter De Smidt wrote:
    > How was this unclear?
    matter of proletarian vigilance, I will apologize, but not concede my
    justice in such matters until proletarians do not need to be as vigilant

    --
    Comrade
    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]
    the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
    [url]http://www.aclu.org/dissentreport[/url]
    Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesus
    we must close the door by which aristocracy arises

    Statements of supposed science, without statistics, are just as much religion,
    and ONLY statements of faith as any religion, or statement of faith,
    except they profess the supposed scientist is God, even more
    dangerous than religion or God. There is no science, without a statement of
    statistics, AND any statement without statistics, is a conjecture of faith
    by the professor of such statement, and the "believer". An ethical
    house cleaning of science and government is in order.

    "Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
    Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
    than the man who has the good forced upon him?"
    a quote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kubrick

    Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incurred tutelage.
    Tutelage is man's inability to make use of his understanding
    without direction from another. Self-incurred is this tutelage when
    its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution
    and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere aude!
    "Have courage to use your own reason!" - that is the motto
    of enlightenment.
    Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

    "It all sums up into one single purpose,
    the abolition of dog-eat-dog under which we live...
    and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
    -- Roger Baldwin, Co-Founder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

    "Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in
    Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in"
    MOODY BLUES

    "Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:6
    (religious and political leaders that are hypocrites)

    (leaven is yeast, AIR IN BREAD, bullshit, fluff, marketing, snake oil - HYPOCRISY)

    "How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:11-12

    "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."--Matthew 23:14

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."--Matthew 23:15

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone."--Matthew 23:23

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess."--Matthew 23:25

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."--Matthew 23:27

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,"--Matthew 23:29

    "And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod."--Mark 8:15

    "And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the marketplaces,"--Mark 12:38


    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]

    Comrade Guest

  17. #16

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    "Comrade" <averagejoe@mysolution.ws> wrote in
    news:pan.2003.07.23.00.20.38.869051@mysolution.ws:
    > On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:23:40 -0700, David Nebenzahl wrote:
    >
    >> As I read the OP's question, he accidently [over]exposed
    >
    > WRONG, he did not eludidate the exposure at all

    He said he shot 200 speed film at 100. That's called an exposure
    difference here on planet Earth, to the english-speaking community.

    That's two threads where you not only had no idea what you were
    talking about, you got arrogant about your ignorance as well. You've got
    some good company now, down there...

    [Plonk]


    - Al.

    --
    To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below
    Online photo gallery at [url]www.wading-in.net[/url]
    Al Denelsbeck Guest

  18. #17

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 03:24:58 +0000, Al Denelsbeck wrote:
    > He said he shot 200 speed film at 100. That's called an exposure
    > difference here on planet Earth, to the english-speaking community.
    apolly pologies


    --
    Comrade
    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]
    the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
    [url]http://www.aclu.org/dissentreport[/url]
    Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesus
    we must close the door by which aristocracy arises

    Statements of supposed science, without statistics, are just as much religion,
    and ONLY statements of faith as any religion, or statement of faith,
    except they profess the supposed scientist is God, even more
    dangerous than religion or God. There is no science, without a statement of
    statistics, AND any statement without statistics, is a conjecture of faith
    by the professor of such statement, and the "believer". An ethical
    house cleaning of science and government is in order.

    "Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
    Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
    than the man who has the good forced upon him?"
    a quote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kubrick

    Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incurred tutelage.
    Tutelage is man's inability to make use of his understanding
    without direction from another. Self-incurred is this tutelage when
    its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution
    and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere aude!
    "Have courage to use your own reason!" - that is the motto
    of enlightenment.
    Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

    "It all sums up into one single purpose,
    the abolition of dog-eat-dog under which we live...
    and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
    -- Roger Baldwin, Co-Founder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

    "Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in
    Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in"
    MOODY BLUES

    "Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:6
    (religious and political leaders that are hypocrites)

    (leaven is yeast, AIR IN BREAD, bullshit, fluff, marketing, snake oil - HYPOCRISY)

    "How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:11-12

    "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."--Matthew 23:14

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."--Matthew 23:15

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone."--Matthew 23:23

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess."--Matthew 23:25

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."--Matthew 23:27

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,"--Matthew 23:29

    "And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod."--Mark 8:15

    "And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the marketplaces,"--Mark 12:38


    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]

    Comrade Guest

  19. #18

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 01:32:34 -0400, Comrade wrote:
    > apolly pologies
    now, that is a 1 stop difference

    color negative films have PLENTY of over exposure latitutude so it is best
    to overexpose some, they haev 3 or more stops over latitude and just a
    little under, maybe 1, 2 possibly

    so, it all really depends on his lighting and aperture too

    but 1 stop over, would even be better than a normal, CERTAINLY if we
    weren't dealing with a scene of dynamic range like a wedding dress and
    tuxedo situation, and if you pull then, the curves are going to cross all
    over the place, no pushable/pullable film, can deliver real good color,
    certainly not wedding quality,
    push is really a speed getter of old that died with photojournalism digital
    and pull is just a resort to save real bad exposures

    and I am sure the fine art community will speak up about B&W applications,
    etc. .... all of which abstract art is much better done in photoshop, or
    even better [url]www.gimp.org[/url], support a BRAVE GNU WORLD

    --
    Comrade
    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]
    the aristocracy was the problem in 1776, the aristocracy is the problem today
    [url]http://www.aclu.org/dissentreport[/url]
    Arisocrats CRUCIFIED Jesus
    we must close the door by which aristocracy arises

    Statements of supposed science, without statistics, are just as much religion,
    and ONLY statements of faith as any religion, or statement of faith,
    except they profess the supposed scientist is God, even more
    dangerous than religion or God. There is no science, without a statement of
    statistics, AND any statement without statistics, is a conjecture of faith
    by the professor of such statement, and the "believer". An ethical
    house cleaning of science and government is in order.

    "Does God want goodness? or the choice of goodness?
    Is the man who chooses bad, somehow better,
    than the man who has the good forced upon him?"
    a quote from the movie, A Clockwork Orange, Kubrick

    Enlightenment is man's release from his self-incurred tutelage.
    Tutelage is man's inability to make use of his understanding
    without direction from another. Self-incurred is this tutelage when
    its cause lies not in lack of reason but in lack of resolution
    and courage to use it without direction from another. Sapere aude!
    "Have courage to use your own reason!" - that is the motto
    of enlightenment.
    Kant -- What Is Enlightenment? 1784

    "It all sums up into one single purpose,
    the abolition of dog-eat-dog under which we live...
    and I traveled the United Front road to get it."
    -- Roger Baldwin, Co-Founder ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)

    "Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in
    Timothy Leary's dead, No No No No, He's outside, looking in"
    MOODY BLUES

    "Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:6
    (religious and political leaders that are hypocrites)

    (leaven is yeast, AIR IN BREAD, bullshit, fluff, marketing, snake oil - HYPOCRISY)

    "How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."--Matthew 16:11-12

    "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."--Matthew 23:13

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."--Matthew 23:14

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."--Matthew 23:15

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone."--Matthew 23:23

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess."--Matthew 23:25

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness."--Matthew 23:27

    "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,"--Matthew 23:29

    "And he charged them, saying, Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod."--Mark 8:15

    "And he said unto them in his doctrine, Beware of the scribes, which love to go in long clothing, and love salutations in the marketplaces,"--Mark 12:38


    see my ROAD TO THE UNITED FRONT [url]http://www.mysolution.ws[/url]

    Comrade Guest

  20. #19

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull


    "Mark" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message
    news:vi0Ta.3659$Fy1.169009@localhost...
    > I shot a roll of 200 ASA at 100. Should I have this pulled one stop,
    > or is there little difference in the outcome?
    >
    >
    > Mark
    >
    Probably not an issue. If it's (actual, not C-41) B&W, you might consider
    it; the contrast will probably be a bit low, otherwise it will probably be a
    bit dense to print. If color print, pulling will probably cause more of a
    problem with color balance. In either case, I wouldn't sweat one stop. If
    it's slide film, you're screwed (sorry!).

    Ken Hart


    Ken Hart Guest

  21. #20

    Default Re: To pull or not to pull

    Spoken like someone who shoots little or no slide film. Most slide films at least rate
    a half stop less than the rated asa if not a full stop. If he bracketed the exposures he'll
    be fine without the pull, at worst case maybe pulling a 1/4 or half stop will
    actually decrease contrast and increase the saturation.

    In article <bfnjo5$3u9$1@news.chatlink.com>, "Ken Hart" <kwhart@aec.nu> wrote:
    > If it's slide film, you're screwed (sorry!).
    >
    > Ken Hart
    --
    Check out my website @
    [url]http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank[/url]

    Considering eating out?; You may end up spending a fortune in cookies.
    Gregory W. Blank Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139