Tutorial on MS site. Why would this be implemented?

[Dave]

[url]http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;299983[/url]


Dave

[Chris Hohmann]

Dave-

Here are two excellent articles that discuss implementing WSC's and
there beneifts.

[url]http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/webtech/050400-1.shtml[/url]
[url]http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/webtech/101800-1.shtml[/url]

In brief, WSC's offer a nice middle ground between ASP and full fledged
(compiled) components. All the fun of component architecture without the
headaches. What's not to love. The most compelling (and often
overlooked) aspect of WSC's is the fact that you don't even have to
register them! What this means is that is a shared hosting environment,
you can do COM without having to plead with the sysadmins at your
service provider to register your component. Understandablly, sysadmins
are reluctant to even discuss custom componnents installing/updating a
component requires IIS to be shutdown.

[Roy in]

do these suckers maintain state across pages?



"Chris Hohmann" <hohmannATyahooDOTcom> wrote in message
news:ORXCD4FWDHA.488@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

> Dave-
>
> Here are two excellent articles that discuss implementing WSC's and
> there beneifts.
>
> [url]http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/webtech/050400-1.shtml[/url]
> [url]http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/webtech/101800-1.shtml[/url]
>
> In brief, WSC's offer a nice middle ground between ASP and full fledged
> (compiled) components. All the fun of component architecture without the
> headaches. What's not to love. The most compelling (and often
> overlooked) aspect of WSC's is the fact that you don't even have to
> register them! What this means is that is a shared hosting environment,
> you can do COM without having to plead with the sysadmins at your
> service provider to register your component. Understandablly, sysadmins
> are reluctant to even discuss custom componnents installing/updating a
> component requires IIS to be shutdown.
>
>
>
>

[Chris Hohmann]

"Roy in <%=H.E.Double Toothpicks $>" <Roy@DoubleToothpicks.com> wrote in
message news:eswnxAGWDHA.656@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...

> do these suckers maintain state across pages?

Absolutely. With WSC's, as is true for COM in general, you have the
option to "implement" the ASP object model. As such, assuming you want
it, you have access to all of ASP's intrinsic object/methods/properties,
including the Session object. If you want to roll your own state
management for a web farm or for state management across multiple web
apps, WSC fits very nicely into those models as well.

Here's a link to the implements tag in WSC:
[url]http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/script56/html/leteleimplements.asp[/url]

[Roy in]

so i spent more than a few gruelling brain cycles trying to create a class
in asp , only to eventually discover that they would not hold stgate.

this will be fun.

How new is this?

"Chris Hohmann" <hohmannATyahooDOTcom> wrote in message
news:OQ$1CHHWDHA.212@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

> "Roy in <%=H.E.Double Toothpicks $>" <Roy@DoubleToothpicks.com> wrote in
> message news:eswnxAGWDHA.656@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...

> > do these suckers maintain state across pages?

>
> Absolutely. With WSC's, as is true for COM in general, you have the
> option to "implement" the ASP object model. As such, assuming you want
> it, you have access to all of ASP's intrinsic object/methods/properties,
> including the Session object. If you want to roll your own state
> management for a web farm or for state management across multiple web
> apps, WSC fits very nicely into those models as well.
>
> Here's a link to the implements tag in WSC:
> [url]http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/script56/html/leteleimplements.asp[/url]
>
>

[Chris Hohmann]

"Roy in <%=H.E.Double Toothpicks $>" <Roy@DoubleToothpicks.com> wrote in
message news:e5Q$CyHWDHA.216@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...

> so i spent more than a few gruelling brain cycles trying to create a

class

> in asp , only to eventually discover that they would not hold stgate.
>
> this will be fun.
>
> How new is this?

Andrew Clinick published the following article on 1999-10-13, so WSC is
at least as old as that and more likely several months to a year older.

[url]http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnclinic/html/scripting091399.asp[/url]

[Roy in]

why are they making this new stuff up when they should be funneling everyone
to dot net?


"Chris Hohmann" <hohmannATyahooDOTcom> wrote in message
news:%23YsCZ1IWDHA.2284@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

> "Roy in <%=H.E.Double Toothpicks $>" <Roy@DoubleToothpicks.com> wrote in
> message news:e5Q$CyHWDHA.216@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...

> > so i spent more than a few gruelling brain cycles trying to create a

> class

> > in asp , only to eventually discover that they would not hold stgate.
> >
> > this will be fun.
> >
> > How new is this?

>
> Andrew Clinick published the following article on 1999-10-13, so WSC is
> at least as old as that and more likely several months to a year older.
>
> [url]http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnclinic/html/scripting091399.asp[/url]
>
>