Video quality vs bandwidth

Ask a Question related to Macromedia Flash Flashcom, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Video quality vs bandwidth

    Hello experts,

    We would like to make use of Flash Media Server as our streaming server to
    make a live video broadcast on the website. Bit rate 500 kb/sec is the video
    quality requirement. Is that mean each session will use up 500kb? We expect
    there will be 1000 concurrent sessions to our website to see the live broadcast
    online. Is that mean 500kb x 1000 = 500MB bandwidth will be used at that period
    of time? We urgently need to know if there is any configuration / settings in
    the server to reduce the cost to pay for the internet (we may need to pay for a
    1GB broadband which is expensive) without making the video quality poor. Any
    idea?

    -FATKUEN

    ?? Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. video quality
      With the av presence componets I have tried to get a larger video but the quality is not there. Is it possible by any mean to stream a live webcam...
    2. Webcam video recording bandwidth
      hi all, When capturing a webcam feed using FMS - is there any loss of information during the upload process? If my client has a limited uplink...
    3. Bandwidth Detection for live video stream
      Hi, I am developing an application in which i m broadcasting my audio and video to other users. Can i somehow get the bandwidth of this...
    4. Bandwidth Calculations for streaming video
      We have 3 personal editions of FCS 1.5 stacked, giving us a limit of 150 concurrent connections and 3Mbps (megabits) bandwidth. We want to stream...
    5. Live video and bandwidth issues
      Hi everybody. I am quite new to the Flashcom server and I have been asked to provide a feasibility studio about an upcoming project that will...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Video quality vs bandwidth

    Are you going to use On2 VP6 w/ Flash Media Encoder? If you set the video to
    500 kbps, then it will roughly stay around that number for the actual
    bandwidth. This could be for video only though, so you'll have to make sure
    that you figure in audio if you haven't already. An 11 Khz audio rate will use
    up around 31-33 kbps. With 1,000 users you will use roughly 500 mbps (megabits
    per second). You'll want to have probably at least 768 kbps upload on the
    broadcasting connection too.

    Are you using a CDN / Streaming service?
    How long are you planning on running the event?

    MMLincoln Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Video quality vs bandwidth

    Thanks for your information MMLincoln =)
    I am not sure if we are going to use On2 VP6 - i have to confirm with my
    technical guy. You have also raise a good point about the bandwidth for audio
    which we have never think about. What we are really concern is the
    international bandwidth we would like to buy from ISP in order to make sure the
    users in other countries can view the video very smoothly. Is 10MB enough for
    1000 concurrent users with 768 mbps?

    ?? Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: Video quality vs bandwidth

    500kbps x 1000 stream = ~ 500 mbps inevitable;
    apart from using On Vp6, you may also want decrease the frame rate a bit <20
    fps depending upon motion in your live stream. using these two ways you should
    be able to achieve similar video quality with lesser bandwidth consumption per
    stream.


    fmslove Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: Video quality vs bandwidth

    Thanks. But do you think a dedicated 10 MB broadband enough to cater these 1000
    concurrent sessions?
    It is actually a live racing broadcast channel so I'm not sure if decrease
    the frame rate will help. Would you please advice?

    ?? Guest

  7. #6

    Default Re: Video quality vs bandwidth

    Theoretically 10 Mbps broadband is sufficient for only 20 (19 downstream + 1
    up-stream); In practice, this number will go lower due to network fluctuation
    (even a fluctuating clients link can make FMSs network usage fluctuate due to
    buffer settings). Also, one should to keep some bandwidth spare as initial data
    transfer FMS to flash player can be a bit more sure to client buffer settings.

    fmslove Guest

  8. #7

    Default Re: Video quality vs bandwidth

    That's unfortunate - as the money to pay for the international bandwisth is
    really expensive. Just wanna think of any approach wich can save bandwidth
    without making the quaility poor.

    I heard that we can set either unicast or multicast for broadcasting. Is that
    a possible way to save the bandwidth?

    ?? Guest

  9. #8

    Default Re: Video quality vs bandwidth

    I would recommend setting up a test system. Just take a recording of a previous
    event or a similar racing video and pipe that into your capture card and
    through the flash server. Load up Flash Media Encoder (for On2 VP6) and a
    viewer and start tweaking the audio/video settings until you find something
    that will work for you. It possible that you might be able to get by with
    something lower than 500 kbps.

    MMLincoln Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139