Ask a Question related to Adobe Photoshop 7, CS, CS2 & CS3, Design and Development.
-
Mac McDougald #1
Re: Web format
As far as images are concerned, you really can't.
Unless you keep everything smaller than 640x480 to accomodate anyone
still running in that mode. And remember that even someone running
640x480 needs images smaller than that to keep from scrolling because of
browser overhead (menus, status bars, etc).
Images have x by x pixel dimensions, simple as that.
The higher the screen rez folks are running, the smaller the image will
appear on screen.
As far as text, it will naturally wrap or you can limit screen size by
using tables with % calls; or use CSS (beyond me).
You should generally avoid making images of text wherever possible.
Mac
Mac McDougald Guest
-
FMS Log format
I am seeing that log entries in FMS 3 are not in separate line. Why is that happening? Can someone advice? -
Placing an image in a Tab Fixed format without messing up the format??
I will do my best to explain the problem. First of all, this is an XP machine and I am using CS InDesign (the version of InDesign that one can... -
Best EPS format?
I work on a Mac and I'd like to know the best EPS format so it can be opened in any program that supports EPS's on a PC. -
.dds format
* .dds, as in "DirectDrawSurface (for 3D applications)? Or did you mean (through either typos or lack of understanding) *.psd, the standard suffix... -
format number into currency format ($1,000,000.00)
SELECT '$' + CONVERT(VARCHAR, CONVERT(MONEY, 1000000), 1) "lamP" <phantlam@yahoo.com> wrote in message... -
Colin Walls #2
Re: Web format
It would be wonderful, IMHO, if you could define a Web page with all the layout set the way you and have that scale in size according to the resolution and window size of the client.
But you can't, as HTML doesn't work like that.
Colin Walls Guest
-
hot_denim #3
Re: Web format
Colin
IE 6 has a Zoom object. you can display e.g. buttons at a maginified size etc.. Maybe you can zoom the BODY object (and thus its containing contents) to a certain size dependent on screen dimentions (via script).
hot_denim Guest
-
Colin Walls #4
Re: Web format
h_d: Yes IE6 can do a zoom-to-fit on images, but that's all. Text layout is still inflexible. Also, the zoom is switchable, so you can't assume that it will be there. However, a browser could be designed that did scaling.
Colin Walls Guest
-
hot_denim #5
Re: Web format
James
You cannot; You can however create a page that is 'compatible' with all screen resoulutions etc..
I would say the 800x600 is the standard web resouluion. (640x480..let them have to scroll the browser window..) There fore design for this resolution
Create pages by using invisible column/rows via creating a TABLE with 0 width border/padding/cell spacing.. thus making it invisible. Then Creating cell within it of certain diemtions as your prefreed layout.
Now also set hte TABLE to be centered in the page. Thus it will be centered at all resolutions. Ooptionally make it 100% width, instead of 800 (pixel) width. This it will grow in eidth for all resoulutions and things will space out evenly.....
hot_denim Guest
-
Seth Meranda #6
Re: Web format
Photoshop is mainly for graphic creations. Invest in Dreamweaver,
Frontpage, or GoLive (the former being the best, IMHO) to get the most out
of creating for the web. Photoshop can still be used to create your images
and graphics.
--
Seth Meranda
[email]web@meranda.org[/email]
"James Hungerford" <jg79000@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1de9b14f.-1@WebX.la2eafNXanI...
Im new to using photoshop as a webdesign tool, so I need to have a few
questions answered. How do I format my web page so it will be compatable
with all resolutions and browser window size?
Seth Meranda Guest
-
DavidF #7
Re: Web format
No, until about a month ago I was using a Win98se 350 mhtz desktop and a
WinME laptop. I jumped to a 3 ghtz Pentium 4 machine with XP (just a little
difference ;-), but have no intention of buying 2003. 2003 offers a few
features that would be nice (like measurements in pixels), but the downsides
aren't worth it to me. Besides, 2000 does everything I need.
It sounds like you have found other reasons for TRRed's problems anyway.
DavidF
"David Bartosik - MS MVP" <dbartosik@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:u9lSUz2FEHA.3908@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...about> huh, I have no recollection of that.
> now you have 2003 don't you?
> can it be repro'd in 2003?
>
> "DavidF" <Nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:%23D4iAFzFEHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...> > Yeah, this getting oldererer is for the birds. Here is a final postgoing> testing> > the issue, June 26, 2003...I guess it was a while ago, and with all the
> > people you help, I am not surprised you forgot this little aberration:
> >
> > Hello guys, I heard from MS today about your issue.
> >
> > I was told that they could not reproduce the issue in version 2002.
> >
> > I was told that none of them are running version 2000 and that their> > this in version 2000 is irrelevant because version 2000 code is notoffer> to> > be fixed.
> >
> > So. Looks like Mr. Foster will be keeping his workaround.
> >
> > I hope you guys didn't have your hopes up.
> >
> > David Bartosik - Microsoft MVP
> > Visit [url]www.davidbartosik.com[/url]
> > for Publisher and Web Design
> > Tips and How-to's.
> >
> >
> > "David Bartosik - MS MVP" <dbartosik@mvps.org> wrote in message
> > news:#G2XSwyFEHA.1912@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...> > > Really? I'm getting old. I don't recall this at all. :-(
> > >
> > > "DavidF" <Nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
> > > news:%23C95olyFEHA.3576@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > > TRRed, Though I would suggest you take David Bartosik up on hismy> to> help.> > > > review your Pub file, maybe my experience with Publisher 2000 will> > I> > same,> > > > too have a Dell laptop and a desktop and found that even though the
> > > > resolution of both the laptop screen and my desktop monitor were the> > > > and all other variables the same, when I produced the web site fromover> > different> > > > laptop, the result and formatting when viewed after posting was> > possible,> > > > than from the desktop. At the time David B. bet me that was not> > > > but after viewing my files agreed it was happening, and turned itwould> it> > to> > for.> > > > the development team. Bottom line, they never did figure out the why> > > >
> > > > My workaround was to take the Pub file, if I had modified or changed> > in> > again> > > > the laptop, copy it over to my desktop, open and save the file, open> > > > and then produce the web files, and post those. At least I got a
> > > consistent
> > > > result that way.
> > > >
> > > > As I said, your problems may have nothing to do with this, and I> will> > > avail
> > > > myself of David Bartosik's offer to review your files, but maybe it>> >> > > > give you some insight as to your issues. DavidF
> > > >
> > > > "TRRed" <TRRed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:164d601c416c0$595cea90$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> > > > > Re: Publisher 2003
> > > > >
> > > > > I created a website on a (Dell) laptop in Publisher,
> > > > > checking and adjusting the alignment frequently through
> > > > > the preview function. The alignment is skewed in
> > > > > Publisher, but appears fine in Internet Explore (v. 6),
> > > > > both as a preview and when I published and uploaded to the
> > > > > web. However, when I view the site
> > > > > ([url]www.rockymountaintaxservices.com[/url]) from a desktop with IE
> > > > > 6, the formatting is off. (Also, the "Home" link is not
> > > > > working, but I think I resolve that.)
> > > > >
> > > > > I checked David Bartosik's site and this forum. After
> > > > > brief searches of both, I did not find a solution.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts and suggestions would be appreciated.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
DavidF Guest
-
David Bartosik - MS MVP #8
Re: Web format
asking for testers to view
[url]http://www.davidbartosik.com/2003samples/rockymountain/[/url]
in their browsers and advise of their findings.
--
David Bartosik - MS MVP
for Publisher help:
[url]www.davidbartosik.com[/url]
enter to win Pub 2003:
[url]www.davidbartosik.com/giveaway.aspx[/url]
David Bartosik - MS MVP Guest
-
DavidF #9
Re: Web format
Loads in both IE 6 & Mozilla 5. Banner image, banner text frame & image
below Nav Bar show up as part of background in IE. Banner image & image
below Nav Bar appear to be a lower resolution in Mozilla, and are GIF
images, not background. Banner 'text frame' shows border, white fill but no
text in Mozilla and is a GIF image. Nav Bar links work on all four pages in
both IE and Mozilla.
It is strange to watch IE load the page with all elements 'in a pile' in
upper left hand corner, and then eventually distribute itself out over the
page. DavidF
"David Bartosik - MS MVP" <forums@davidbartosik.com> wrote in message
news:eBfuxIDGEHA.264@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...> asking for testers to view
> [url]http://www.davidbartosik.com/2003samples/rockymountain/[/url]
> in their browsers and advise of their findings.
>
> --
> David Bartosik - MS MVP
> for Publisher help:
> [url]www.davidbartosik.com[/url]
> enter to win Pub 2003:
> [url]www.davidbartosik.com/giveaway.aspx[/url]
>
>
DavidF Guest
-
Roy #10
Re: Web format
Even with David's revisions, I am still seeing different
alignments between a Dell desktop ("PC") and a Dell
laptop. I'll be happy to send example screenshots if
anyone wants to see difference. Format on PC is fine.
Format on laptop is somewhat off. For example, tagline is
dropped and encroaches on box border. Additional white
space showing between the objects when viewed on laptop.
Also, I mentioned to David that the overlapping objects
and the use of the master page happened after I created
the initial file on the laptop and noticed the alignment
problems. Thus, they were not an initial cause of the
problems.
Roy
>-----Original Message-----
>asking for testers to view
>[url]http://www.davidbartosik.com/2003samples/rockymountain/[/url]
>in their browsers and advise of their findings.
>
>--
>David Bartosik - MS MVP
>for Publisher help:
>[url]www.davidbartosik.com[/url]
>enter to win Pub 2003:
>[url]www.davidbartosik.com/giveaway.aspx[/url]
>
>
>.
>Roy Guest
-
Roy #11
Re: Web format
As mentioned on another thread, the overlapping boxes and
use of the master page were attempts to fix the formatting
problems. While they may not have helped, they were not
the causes, as the problems existed before I brought them
into the mix. If interested, I can e-mail you a file that
has screen shots comparing desktop to laptop on the page
that David created.
Also, as of this point I don't have Publisher (licensed)
on my desktop, so I'll need to defer trying your
workaround.
Roy
mhtz desktop and a>-----Original Message-----
>No, until about a month ago I was using a Win98se 350XP (just a little>WinME laptop. I jumped to a 3 ghtz Pentium 4 machine with2003 offers a few>difference ;-), but have no intention of buying 2003.pixels), but the downsides>features that would be nice (like measurements inneed.>aren't worth it to me. Besides, 2000 does everything Iproblems anyway.>
>It sounds like you have found other reasons for TRRed'smessage>
>DavidF
>
>"David Bartosik - MS MVP" <dbartosik@mvps.org> wrote inis a final post>news:u9lSUz2FEHA.3908@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...>> huh, I have no recollection of that.
>> now you have 2003 don't you?
>> can it be repro'd in 2003?
>>
>> "DavidF" <Nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23D4iAFzFEHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...>> > Yeah, this getting oldererer is for the birds. Hereago, and with all the>about>> > the issue, June 26, 2003...I guess it was a whilelittle aberration:>> > people you help, I am not surprised you forgot thisversion 2002.>> >
>> > Hello guys, I heard from MS today about your issue.
>> >
>> > I was told that they could not reproduce the issue inand that their>> >
>> > I was told that none of them are running version 20002000 code is not>> testing>> > this in version 2000 is irrelevant because versionworkaround.>going>> to>> > be fixed.
>> >
>> > So. Looks like Mr. Foster will be keeping hisin message>> >
>> > I hope you guys didn't have your hopes up.
>> >
>> > David Bartosik - Microsoft MVP
>> > Visit [url]www.davidbartosik.com[/url]
>> > for Publisher and Web Design
>> > Tips and How-to's.
>> >
>> >
>> > "David Bartosik - MS MVP" <dbartosik@mvps.org> wroteall. :-(>> > news:#G2XSwyFEHA.1912@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> > > Really? I'm getting old. I don't recall this atBartosik up on his>> > >
>> > > "DavidF" <Nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:%23C95olyFEHA.3576@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> > > > TRRed, Though I would suggest you take DavidPublisher 2000 will>offer>> to>> > > > review your Pub file, maybe my experience withthat even though the>> help.>> > I
>> > > > too have a Dell laptop and a desktop and founddesktop monitor were the>> > > > resolution of both the laptop screen and mythe web site from>> > same,
>> > > > and all other variables the same, when I producedafter posting was>my>> > > > laptop, the result and formatting when viewedme that was not>> > different
>> > > > than from the desktop. At the time David B. bethappening, and turned it>> > possible,
>> > > > but after viewing my files agreed it wasfigure out the why>over>> > to
>> > > > the development team. Bottom line, they never didmodified or changed>> > for.
>> > > >
>> > > > My workaround was to take the Pub file, if I hadsave the file, open>> it>> > in
>> > > > the laptop, copy it over to my desktop, open andAt least I got a>> > again
>> > > > and then produce the web files, and post those.with this, and I>> > > consistent
>> > > > result that way.
>> > > >
>> > > > As I said, your problems may have nothing to dofiles, but maybe it>would>> > > avail
>> > > > myself of David Bartosik's offer to review yourPublisher,>> will>> > > > give you some insight as to your issues. DavidF
>> > > >
>> > > > "TRRed" <TRRed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > > > news:164d601c416c0$595cea90$a101280a@phx.gbl...
>> > > > > Re: Publisher 2003
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I created a website on a (Dell) laptop inthrough>> > > > > checking and adjusting the alignment frequentlyin>> > > > > the preview function. The alignment is skewed(v. 6),>> > > > > Publisher, but appears fine in Internet Exploreuploaded to the>> > > > > both as a preview and when I published anddesktop with IE>> > > > > web. However, when I view the site
>> > > > > ([url]www.rockymountaintaxservices.com[/url]) from alink is not>> > > > > 6, the formatting is off. (Also, the "Home"forum. After>> > > > > working, but I think I resolve that.)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I checked David Bartosik's site and thissolution.>> > > > > brief searches of both, I did not find a>>>>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thoughts and suggestions would be appreciated.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>.
>Roy Guest
-
DavidF #12
Re: Web format
Roy, You might have to wait until David Bartosik gets back home in a week or
so to get another answer. I sure don't have one for you. One thing you could
try in the meantime is to change the resolution of your display on your
laptop (compare to the desktop monitor), save new html files, upload those
and see how they compare. Sorry I don't have a better suggestion. Good
Luck...DavidF
"Roy" <TRRed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13db101c41b29$8d8306c0$a001280a@phx.gbl...> As mentioned on another thread, the overlapping boxes and
> use of the master page were attempts to fix the formatting
> problems. While they may not have helped, they were not
> the causes, as the problems existed before I brought them
> into the mix. If interested, I can e-mail you a file that
> has screen shots comparing desktop to laptop on the page
> that David created.
>
> Also, as of this point I don't have Publisher (licensed)
> on my desktop, so I'll need to defer trying your
> workaround.
>
> Roy
>> mhtz desktop and a> >-----Original Message-----
> >No, until about a month ago I was using a Win98se 350> XP (just a little> >WinME laptop. I jumped to a 3 ghtz Pentium 4 machine with> 2003 offers a few> >difference ;-), but have no intention of buying 2003.> pixels), but the downsides> >features that would be nice (like measurements in> need.> >aren't worth it to me. Besides, 2000 does everything I> problems anyway.> >
> >It sounds like you have found other reasons for TRRed's> message> >
> >DavidF
> >
> >"David Bartosik - MS MVP" <dbartosik@mvps.org> wrote in> is a final post> >news:u9lSUz2FEHA.3908@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...> >> huh, I have no recollection of that.
> >> now you have 2003 don't you?
> >> can it be repro'd in 2003?
> >>
> >> "DavidF" <Nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
> >> news:%23D4iAFzFEHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> > Yeah, this getting oldererer is for the birds. Here> ago, and with all the> >about> >> > the issue, June 26, 2003...I guess it was a while> little aberration:> >> > people you help, I am not surprised you forgot this> version 2002.> >> >
> >> > Hello guys, I heard from MS today about your issue.
> >> >
> >> > I was told that they could not reproduce the issue in> and that their> >> >
> >> > I was told that none of them are running version 2000> 2000 code is not> >> testing
> >> > this in version 2000 is irrelevant because version> workaround.> >going> >> to
> >> > be fixed.
> >> >
> >> > So. Looks like Mr. Foster will be keeping his> in message> >> >
> >> > I hope you guys didn't have your hopes up.
> >> >
> >> > David Bartosik - Microsoft MVP
> >> > Visit [url]www.davidbartosik.com[/url]
> >> > for Publisher and Web Design
> >> > Tips and How-to's.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "David Bartosik - MS MVP" <dbartosik@mvps.org> wrote> all. :-(> >> > news:#G2XSwyFEHA.1912@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> > > Really? I'm getting old. I don't recall this at> Bartosik up on his> >> > >
> >> > > "DavidF" <Nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
> >> > > news:%23C95olyFEHA.3576@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > TRRed, Though I would suggest you take David> Publisher 2000 will> >offer> >> to
> >> > > > review your Pub file, maybe my experience with> that even though the> >> help.
> >> > I
> >> > > > too have a Dell laptop and a desktop and found> desktop monitor were the> >> > > > resolution of both the laptop screen and my> the web site from> >> > same,
> >> > > > and all other variables the same, when I produced> after posting was> >my> >> > > > laptop, the result and formatting when viewed> me that was not> >> > different
> >> > > > than from the desktop. At the time David B. bet> happening, and turned it> >> > possible,
> >> > > > but after viewing my files agreed it was> figure out the why> >over> >> > to
> >> > > > the development team. Bottom line, they never did> modified or changed> >> > for.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > My workaround was to take the Pub file, if I had> save the file, open> >> it
> >> > in
> >> > > > the laptop, copy it over to my desktop, open and> At least I got a> >> > again
> >> > > > and then produce the web files, and post those.> with this, and I> >> > > consistent
> >> > > > result that way.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > As I said, your problems may have nothing to do> files, but maybe it> >would> >> > > avail
> >> > > > myself of David Bartosik's offer to review your> Publisher,> >> will
> >> > > > give you some insight as to your issues. DavidF
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "TRRed" <TRRed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> > > > news:164d601c416c0$595cea90$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> >> > > > > Re: Publisher 2003
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I created a website on a (Dell) laptop in> through> >> > > > > checking and adjusting the alignment frequently> in> >> > > > > the preview function. The alignment is skewed> (v. 6),> >> > > > > Publisher, but appears fine in Internet Explore> uploaded to the> >> > > > > both as a preview and when I published and> desktop with IE> >> > > > > web. However, when I view the site
> >> > > > > ([url]www.rockymountaintaxservices.com[/url]) from a> link is not> >> > > > > 6, the formatting is off. (Also, the "Home"> forum. After> >> > > > > working, but I think I resolve that.)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I checked David Bartosik's site and this> solution.> >> > > > > brief searches of both, I did not find a> >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thoughts and suggestions would be appreciated.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >.
> >
DavidF Guest
-
DavidF #13
Re: Web format
Du'oh...perhaps try changing the resolution of your desktop monitor and
viewing the site again to compare, before you go to the trouble of producing
new web files from your laptop. DavidF
"Roy" <TRRed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:13db101c41b29$8d8306c0$a001280a@phx.gbl...> As mentioned on another thread, the overlapping boxes and
> use of the master page were attempts to fix the formatting
> problems. While they may not have helped, they were not
> the causes, as the problems existed before I brought them
> into the mix. If interested, I can e-mail you a file that
> has screen shots comparing desktop to laptop on the page
> that David created.
>
> Also, as of this point I don't have Publisher (licensed)
> on my desktop, so I'll need to defer trying your
> workaround.
>
> Roy
>> mhtz desktop and a> >-----Original Message-----
> >No, until about a month ago I was using a Win98se 350> XP (just a little> >WinME laptop. I jumped to a 3 ghtz Pentium 4 machine with> 2003 offers a few> >difference ;-), but have no intention of buying 2003.> pixels), but the downsides> >features that would be nice (like measurements in> need.> >aren't worth it to me. Besides, 2000 does everything I> problems anyway.> >
> >It sounds like you have found other reasons for TRRed's> message> >
> >DavidF
> >
> >"David Bartosik - MS MVP" <dbartosik@mvps.org> wrote in> is a final post> >news:u9lSUz2FEHA.3908@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...> >> huh, I have no recollection of that.
> >> now you have 2003 don't you?
> >> can it be repro'd in 2003?
> >>
> >> "DavidF" <Nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
> >> news:%23D4iAFzFEHA.2512@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> > Yeah, this getting oldererer is for the birds. Here> ago, and with all the> >about> >> > the issue, June 26, 2003...I guess it was a while> little aberration:> >> > people you help, I am not surprised you forgot this> version 2002.> >> >
> >> > Hello guys, I heard from MS today about your issue.
> >> >
> >> > I was told that they could not reproduce the issue in> and that their> >> >
> >> > I was told that none of them are running version 2000> 2000 code is not> >> testing
> >> > this in version 2000 is irrelevant because version> workaround.> >going> >> to
> >> > be fixed.
> >> >
> >> > So. Looks like Mr. Foster will be keeping his> in message> >> >
> >> > I hope you guys didn't have your hopes up.
> >> >
> >> > David Bartosik - Microsoft MVP
> >> > Visit [url]www.davidbartosik.com[/url]
> >> > for Publisher and Web Design
> >> > Tips and How-to's.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "David Bartosik - MS MVP" <dbartosik@mvps.org> wrote> all. :-(> >> > news:#G2XSwyFEHA.1912@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >> > > Really? I'm getting old. I don't recall this at> Bartosik up on his> >> > >
> >> > > "DavidF" <Nope@nospam.com> wrote in message
> >> > > news:%23C95olyFEHA.3576@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> > > > TRRed, Though I would suggest you take David> Publisher 2000 will> >offer> >> to
> >> > > > review your Pub file, maybe my experience with> that even though the> >> help.
> >> > I
> >> > > > too have a Dell laptop and a desktop and found> desktop monitor were the> >> > > > resolution of both the laptop screen and my> the web site from> >> > same,
> >> > > > and all other variables the same, when I produced> after posting was> >my> >> > > > laptop, the result and formatting when viewed> me that was not> >> > different
> >> > > > than from the desktop. At the time David B. bet> happening, and turned it> >> > possible,
> >> > > > but after viewing my files agreed it was> figure out the why> >over> >> > to
> >> > > > the development team. Bottom line, they never did> modified or changed> >> > for.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > My workaround was to take the Pub file, if I had> save the file, open> >> it
> >> > in
> >> > > > the laptop, copy it over to my desktop, open and> At least I got a> >> > again
> >> > > > and then produce the web files, and post those.> with this, and I> >> > > consistent
> >> > > > result that way.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > As I said, your problems may have nothing to do> files, but maybe it> >would> >> > > avail
> >> > > > myself of David Bartosik's offer to review your> Publisher,> >> will
> >> > > > give you some insight as to your issues. DavidF
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "TRRed" <TRRed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> > > > news:164d601c416c0$595cea90$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> >> > > > > Re: Publisher 2003
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I created a website on a (Dell) laptop in> through> >> > > > > checking and adjusting the alignment frequently> in> >> > > > > the preview function. The alignment is skewed> (v. 6),> >> > > > > Publisher, but appears fine in Internet Explore> uploaded to the> >> > > > > both as a preview and when I published and> desktop with IE> >> > > > > web. However, when I view the site
> >> > > > > ([url]www.rockymountaintaxservices.com[/url]) from a> link is not> >> > > > > 6, the formatting is off. (Also, the "Home"> forum. After> >> > > > > working, but I think I resolve that.)
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I checked David Bartosik's site and this> solution.> >> > > > > brief searches of both, I did not find a> >> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thoughts and suggestions would be appreciated.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >.
> >
DavidF Guest



Reply With Quote

