Ask a Question related to Adobe Indesign Windows, Design and Development.
-
jlgarcia@adobeforums.com #1
Why frames?
One reason not to use Quark is that they use frames for anything....
Does anybody know why InDesign needs to use frames instead of just placing any picture on the page like PageMaker, or Corel, or Illustrator? It is just to be like Quark?
jlgarcia@adobeforums.com Guest
-
Using FRAMES
I'm some-what new to dreamweaver. I built 6 sites that are pretty simple. I would like to start using frames. Can someone please guide me through... -
Frames Help
I have a site with a side frame that is acting a little bit wierd, and i cant figure out why. The side frame basically calls other things, using... -
php like frames?
Someone told me that you can use php to make a webpage that works like having frames. (Boy that's a cryptic statement) Let me try to explain.... -
frames and php
I have a html page divided into three frames (and I'm a total newbie to php) if i need to say click on an image in the first frame which I... -
new frames
every time i create a frame 2 or wut ever it is the same as frame 1. i dont know how to make that frame its own frame -
Dave_Saunders@adobeforums.com #2
Re: Why frames?
It's not like Quark. You can just place a picture on a page, just as you could we PageMaker, but it is placed with a frame so you don't have to go through the kinds of hoops you had to in PageMaker to create a keyline.
Dave
Dave_Saunders@adobeforums.com Guest
-
Scott_McCullough@adobeforums.com #3
Re: Why frames?
Don't think of it as a "frame," but as a cropping box within which the graphic resides. Unlike Quark, you don't have to draw a box before you can place the picture. But unlike PageMaker, it's easy to crop, scale, and frame a graphic without changing tools. Once you get used to it, I think you'll realize InDesign offers the best of both Quark and PageMaker, without as many of the antiquated quirks and workarounds.
Scott_McCullough@adobeforums.com Guest
-
Scott_Falkner@adobeforums.com #4
Re: Why frames?
I agree that the Indesign aproach is the best of both worlds. QuarkXPress's use of frames, especially for pictures, was miles ahed of PageWrecker's. I can't begin to describve the frustration of cropping an image, but keeping the same size, in PageMangler. Crop (oops, made it smaller), switch tools, enlarge (oh, now I need it moved within the frame), switch tools, crop (hmm, still a bit too small), switch tools, scale, switch tools, crop, go to drugstore, buy razor blades, slit wrists, decide that the upcoming Simpson's marathon is reason to live, call 911...
Scott_Falkner@adobeforums.com Guest
-
JohnO@adobeforums.com #5
Re: Why frames?
>the upcoming Simpson's marathon ...
When????
jgarcia: you'll get used to ID pretty quick, and these new frames are real
easy to deal with. When I switched they made me crazy at first, but not
anymore.
-John O
JohnO@adobeforums.com Guest
-
Scott_Falkner@adobeforums.com #6
Re: Why frames?
Oh, and the preview of cropped parts of an image: ya gotta love it!
Scott_Falkner@adobeforums.com Guest
-
jlgarcia@adobeforums.com #7
Re: Why frames?
i'll give it a try. I just want to place an image in the page and adjust a bit... and you don't really want to be close to me when I resize the image and nothing happens... it's like pressing the accelerator pedal on the car and been still in the same place... thanks for your answers...
jlgarcia@adobeforums.com Guest
-
Don_McCahill@adobeforums.com #8
Re: Why frames?
It could be worse ... when you press the brake pedal and nothing happens.
Don_McCahill@adobeforums.com Guest
-
Tom_Lassiter@adobeforums.com #9
Re: Why frames?
I'm obviously missing something. I can't crop and resize a photo in inDesign WITHOUT changing tools (from Select for cropping to Direct Select for resizing and back. I'm from the PageMaker/Freehand world, and the tool switching seems highly non-intuitive, though I've learned to cope.
In PageMaker, I had a proportional Scale tool in the little Info Palette that let me scale soooo easily. I'm missing that in inDesign.
Can someone point me to the trick for cropping and scaling without going to the Tool Palette time and again?
Thanks much.
Tom_Lassiter@adobeforums.com Guest
-
Bob_Levine #10
Re: Why frames?
If you're using ID CS then get yourself the PM plugin which include that
very tool. If you bought the entire Creative Suite, you're entitled to a
free copy. Call Adobe.
Bob
Bob_Levine Guest
-
Ellen_Pickels@adobeforums.com #11
Re: Why frames?
Tom,
You can indeed scale with the Select tool. Just hold down Ctrl + Shift and the frame and content resize together.
Ellen_Pickels@adobeforums.com Guest
-
Bob_Levine #12
Re: Why frames?
I don't think that's what he's trying to do, though. I think he wants to
scale and crop. You can't move the graphic around in the frame without
the direct select tool.
It really is easier with the PM tool especially for someone really used
to PM's way of doing it.
Bob
Bob_Levine Guest
-
Uwe_Rottkamp@adobeforums.com #13
Re: Why frames?
Tom,
that let me scale soooo easily. I'm missing that in inDesign.> In PageMaker, I had a proportional Scale tool in the little Info Palette
What scale-tool do you mean? I don't remember any tools in the info
palette??
to the Tool Palette time and again?> Can someone point me to the trick for cropping and scaling without going
To crop images use the selecting-tool at the frame, scaling use the same
tool pressung <Ctrl>+<shift>. Scaling the image without scaling the frame
use the direct-selecting tool, also to move the image withing the frame.
Though I like PM for some special features, THIS couldn't be done more
comfortable and took the advantages both from PM and quark....
Uwe
Uwe_Rottkamp@adobeforums.com Guest



Reply With Quote

